p-ISSN: 1306-696x | e-ISSN: 1307-7945

Quick Search




SCImago Journal & Country Rank
COMPARISON OF OPEN AND CLOSED LAVAGE TECHNIQUES IN BLUNT AND PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMA [Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 1997; 3(3): 243-246

COMPARISON OF OPEN AND CLOSED LAVAGE TECHNIQUES IN BLUNT AND PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMA

İhsan Diler Özaçmak1, Mustafa Baloğlu1, Atalay Işık1, Hasan Lice1
Taksim Hastanesi 1. Cerrahi Kliniği

During a three year period patients seen following blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma were managed either with closed or with open lavage technique in a prospective and randomised manner of the 189 patients undergoing DPL 102 of them were accomplished with the open and the remaining 87 with the closed technique. 134 patients had blunt and 55 penetrating abdominal trauma. Applied technique, lavage time, active operation time, volume of aspirated fluid, results of microscopic examination, operative findings and complications were recorded for each patient. Comparisons were made with Fisher's exact t-test. In open DPL group, lavage time for grossly positive and microscopically positive cases were 11±8 mm. (3-24) and 22±16 min (8-55) respectively. The same numbers for the closed group were 3±2 min. (1-10) for the grossly and 24±9 min (11-47) for the microscopically positives. The difference in lavage time of grossly positives between the open and closed technique groups was slightly significant (p<0.05). Active operation time for open and closed groups were 12± 7 min. (4-37) and 4±2 min. (1-21) respectively (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the volumes of re-aspirated fluid between the two techniques. Considering the results of this study we think the closed technique with its quick and easy application and better patient toleration to be the primary choice in cases of abdominal trauma in whom some form of DPL appears to be necessary.

Keywords: BLUNT ABDOMINAL TRAUMA, PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMA, DIAGNOTIC PERITONEAL LAVAGE

KÜNT VE PENETRAN KARIN TRAVMALARINDA KAPALI VE AÇIK LAVAJ TEKNİKLERİNİN KIYASLANMASI

İhsan Diler Özaçmak1, Mustafa Baloğlu1, Atalay Işık1, Hasan Lice1
Taksim Hastanesi 1. Cerrahi Kliniği

3 yıllık sürede, künt veya penetran batın travması nedeniyle, acil başvuran hastalara, prospektif ve randomize olarak açık ve kapalı tekniklerle lavaj uyguladık. 134'ü künt, 55'i penetran travmaya karşı kalan 189 hastadan 102'sine açık, 87'sine kapalı (perkütan) teknikle lavaj yapıldı. Her hastada, uygulanan teknik, lavaj için gereken zaman aktif operasyon süresi, geriye alınabilen sıvı miktarı, mikroskopik sonuçlar, aperatif bulgular ve komplikasyonlar kaydedildi. Sonuçlar Fisher'in exact t testi ile değerlendirildi. Açık DPL grubunda belirgin pozitif lavaj süresi ortalama 11±8 dk. (3-24), kapalı grupta ise 3±2 dk.(1-10) oldu (p<0.05). Mikroskopik pozitif lavaj ise açık grupta 22±16 dk. (8-55), kapalı grupta 24±9 dk. (11-47) bulundu. Bu işlem esnasında harcanan aktif operasyon süresi açık grupta 12±7 dk. (4-37), kapalı grupta ise 4±2 dk. (1-21) oldu (p<0.05). Geri alınan sıvı miktarı açısından gruplar arasında anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı. Çalışma sonuçları göz önüne alınınca, kapalı metodun ilk uygulama kolaylığı ve hastaların daha rahat talere etmeleri, gerekse kazandırdığı zaman faktörü çerçevesinde ilk tercih edilmesi gereken teknik olduğuna inanıyoruz.

Anahtar Kelimeler: KÜNT KARIN TRAVMASI, DELİCİ VE KESİCİ KARIN TRAVMASI, TANISAL PERİTONEAL LAVAJ

İhsan Diler Özaçmak, Mustafa Baloğlu, Atalay Işık, Hasan Lice. COMPARISON OF OPEN AND CLOSED LAVAGE TECHNIQUES IN BLUNT AND PENETRATING ABDOMINAL TRAUMA. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 1997; 3(3): 243-246