p-ISSN: 1306-696x | e-ISSN: 1307-7945
Cilt : 30 Sayı : 12 Yıl : 2024

Hızlı Arama

SCImago Journal & Country Rank
AKUT APANDİSİT TANISINDA PERİTONEAL ASPİRASYON SİTOLOJİSİNİN YERİ [Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg]
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2003; 9(2): 107-110

AKUT APANDİSİT TANISINDA PERİTONEAL ASPİRASYON SİTOLOJİSİNİN YERİ

Erol Kisli1, Ersin Özgören1, Hasan Arslantürk1, Metin Aydın1, Osman Güler2, İrfan Bayram1
1Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Faklütesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Van, Turkey
2Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Faklütesi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı, Van, Turkey


THE ROLE OF PERITONEAL ASPIRATION CYTOLOGY DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS

Erol Kisli1, Ersin Özgören1, Hasan Arslantürk1, Metin Aydın1, Osman Güler2, İrfan Bayram1
1Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Faklütesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Van, Turkey
2Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tıp Faklütesi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı, Van, Turkey

Background: The purpose of this study is to search the role of peritoneal aspiration cytology in acute appendicitis.
Methods: Peritoneal aspiration cytology was (PAC) conducted for fifty suspected acute appendicitis patients before their operations. PAC findings was compared with histopathologic results.
Results: Negative appendicectomy rate according to clinical diagnosis was 20%. PAC was positive in 32 and negative in 18 patients. 93.75% PAC (+) patients had acute appendicitis, 44.4% PAC (-) patients had normal appendices. The false positive rate was 6.2% and the false negative rate was 55.6%. The sensitivity, the specificity, the positive predictive value, the negative predictive value of PAC for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis were 75%, 80%, 93.8%, 44.4%, respectively and the accuracy was 76%.
Conclusion: PAC positive results support the diagnosis of acute appendicitis strongly. However, PAC (-) results don’t exclude the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Keywords: Acute appendicitis, peritoneal aspiration cytology

Sorumlu Yazar: Erol Kisli, Türkiye
Makale Dili: Türkçe
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Kopyalandı!
ATIF KOPYALA