In the continuum of the complex therapy process of a critically ill patient, the intensive care unit (ICU) period must be followed very meticulously because of the extremely data-intensive circumstances. Intensive care medicine is a lot more reliant on “numbers” than most of the other medical disciplines, and minor errors in the records may lead to wrong decisions, which may cause major harm to the patient. Manual records are prone to errors, inaccuracies and are time-consuming for both nurses maintaining them and physicians trying to interpret them, especially in patients with complex pathologies and long-term stays. Since the introduction of the first general-purpose computer, ENIAC (Electronic Numerical Integrator and Computer) in 1946, there have been attempts to integrate computers into medicine and in the last decades, we are witnessing the emergence of intensive care information systems (ICIS). ICIS has the potential to increase the quality and accuracy of the medical records, while also decreasing the incidence of medical errors. They present electronic decision support and tools for quality control and performance evaluation. More importantly, they allow a medium where the physician can easily assess the current condition of the patient from different perspectives. So far, the usage of ICIS has been limited due to high costs and some other factors. Although we are in a technologically advanced position today, it is still a challenge to implement an ICIS successfully. If not planned properly, it is a process prone to significant delays in time, additional costs, poor acceptance by the staff and even total failure. In this study, we are going to evaluate the past, present and future of intensive care information systems and share our experiences in implementing them.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis can be defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response to infection. In sepsis, the coagulation cascade is activated and the balance shifts to the procoagulant side. Recently, the use of protein C is proposed for the treatment of sepsis. Another therapeutic agent that has been intensively studied is tri-iodothyronine.
METHODS: This study aimed to compare the effects of activated protein C and tri-iodothyronine, which are administered at a single dose to sepsis-induced rats at the late phase. Leukocyte, platelet, hemoglobin and antithrombin-III concentrations and histopathological changes in the small intestine, liver and lung were evaluated at 24 hours.
RESULTS: Single-dose intraperitoneal recombinant human APC (activated protein C) has a partial curative effect on hematological parameters in the late phase, while it is possible to state that it has significant therapeutic effects on hepatic and intestinal tissues, but more remarkably on the lung tissue. Tri-iodothyronine is also considered to be used for the treatment and has a strong potential to be a therapeutic agent.
CONCLUSION: We observed that the T3 hormone has significantly limited and reduced the sepsis-related damage to hepatic and intestinal tissues, but especially the lung tissue. Tri-iodothyronine can be a good alternative to APC, which is partially allowed due to high cost and complication of bleeding in the treatment of sepsis.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aim to assess the safe, risky and high-risky zones by measuring the proximity of the needles to the peroneal and saphenous nerves in millimeters for the repair of tears of the anterior, middle and posterior horns of the medial and lateral menisci at flexion and extension position during inside-out repair technique.
METHODS: First, a cadaveric study was conducted on 10 cadaver knees in which both (lateral and medial) menisci were divided into anterior, corpus and posterior with the longitudinal tear simulating in each section. The next phase involved the suture of the simulated tears of the menisci while the knee was at 90° of flexion and full extension. Finally, the distance from the exit points of the K-wire being inserted through meniscal anterior, corpus and posterior tears to the aforementioned nerves was measured with a digital caliper.
RESULTS: The distance between K-wire exit points and neurovascular structures concerning corpus and anterior horn tear repair of both menisci were considered far away and not included. However, closer posterior menisci measurements were taken to avoid the risk of iatrogenic nerve injury. The measured distances for lateral meniscus posterior tears were recorded 11±5.2 mm at 90° of flexion and 8±4.5 mm at extension, whereas those recorded 17.3±5.7 mm at 90° of flexion and 13.7±4.7 mm at extension for medial meniscus. These variables were evaluated statistically using a paired t-test; the mean of t value was not considered statistically significant.
CONCLUSION: Our results show that the inside-out technique at knee flexion is safe even in the posterior meniscus tears. However, safety distance can be increased with the higher flexion degrees of the knee. Lastly, in posterior meniscal tear repair, we recommend either retractor assisted mini-open technique at knee flexion, or all-inside suture technique, to avoid nerve injury risk in this zone. Although many surgeons do not prefer inside-out techniques for posterior menisci tears, inside-out posterior meniscal repair of both menisci is as safe as an all-inside technique using retractor assisted mini-open technique with the knee at higher than 90° flexion.

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) is a frequent cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) among critically ill patients who have risk factors. This study aimed to determine the relation between Abdominal Perfusion Pressure (APP) and AKI showed by the Doppler-based renal resistive index (RRI).
METHODS: In this study, 38 patients older than 18 years old who received mechanical ventilation and had risk factors for the development of IAH were prospectively studied. All measurements and parameters were divided into two groups according to renal dysfunction (Group I: RRI <0.72 vs Group II: RRI >0.72).
RESULTS: The mean IAPs were not significant between the groups, 11.5±6.9 mm Hg in Group I (n=35) and 13.5±5.8 in Group II (n=33), respectively. APPs were statistically higher in Group I (81.2±13.6) than Group II (66.4±9.5) (p<0.001). The AUC for the association between APP at RRI >0.72 was 0.802 (p<0.001), with the APP ≤72 mmHg having a sensitivity of the 76% (95% CI 58–89%) and a specificity of 71% (95% CI 54–85%).
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that an APP with a threshold of ≤72 mmHg is associated with a significant increase in renal RRI, which may be predictive of worsening of renal perfusion.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic diaphragm ruptures (TDR) are rarely seen. Although TDR does not cause morbidity in the acute period, undiagnosed TDR may cause clinical states, such as herniation, strangulation, pneumonia, pleural effusion, empyema, and cardiac tamponade, which have high morbidity and mortality rates in the late period. This study aims to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnosis and treatment methods of TDR encountered in thoracoabdominal trauma and to identify the factors affecting mortality.

METHODS: A retrospective examination was carried out on the patients who were operated in our clinic because of traumatic diaphragm injury between January 2012 and December 2017. Each patient operated because traumatic diaphragm injury was evaluated in respect of age, gender, manner of injury, preoperative examination findings, laboratory test results, imaging methods, time of diagnosis, operation findings, concomitant injuries to other organs, operations performed, length of stay in hospital, the development of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and the calculated Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS).

RESULTS: Between January 2012 and December 2017, a total of 1066 patients were operated in our clinic because of thoracoabdominal trauma, and of 1066 patients, 45 of the patients were determined with TDR. Of the 45 patients, surgery was applied because of penetrating trauma in 32 cases (7 firearms injuries, 25 penetrating cutting injuries), blunt trauma in nine cases, and in four cases, diaphragm rupture was seen to have developed associated with iatrogenic injury during an operation. The most common injuries concomitant to traumatic diaphragm rupture were hemopneumothorax (70%), liver (43%), spleen (32%), colon (20%), stomach (17%) injuries and rib fractures (15%), respectively. Mortality developed in seven (17%) patients; five patients were lost because of hemorrhagic shock intraoperatively or in the early postoperative hours, and two because of multiorgan failure during follow-up in the intensive care unit.

CONCLUSION: In high energy blunt and penetrating thoracoabdominal traumas, diaphragm injuries should be suspected. Factors affecting mortality were found to be the AISS, ISS, number of concomitant organ injuries and the combination with pneumohemothorax.

BACKGROUND: A rare cause of acute abdomen or intestinal obstruction, the abdominal cocoon syndrome is also described in the literature as sclerosing peritonitis or sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis. Abdominal cocoon is characterized by the total or partial wrapping of the abdominal organs by a fibrous membrane. Although it is usually observed in young women, the etiology is unknown. The diagnosis is usually made during laparotomy. In this case series, we aimed to present seven patients diagnosed with abdominal cocoon syndrome during operation.
METHODS: The records of patients who underwent laparotomy for abdominal pain and/or intestinal obstruction in our hospital and diagnosed as abdominal cocoon during operation between January 2012 and November 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The demographic characteristics of the patients, etiologic factors, surgical procedures, operative findings and follow-up of the patients were recorded.
RESULTS: Four out of seven patients who were operated for abdominal cocoon were male and 3 of them were female. The median age of patients was 61 (57–63) years in male and 39.6 (28–49) years in female. Six of the patients were operated in emergency conditions with the diagnosis of an acute abdomen or ileus. One of the patients was operated with the diagnosis of an intra-abdominal mass in elective conditions. In five out of seven patients, all of the small intestines were wrapped with a fibrous collagen capsule, while two of the patient intestines were partially wrapped with a fibrous collagen capsule. Four of the patients had no underlying disease, while one of the patients had Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), one had Endometriosis and one had beta-blocker medication. One patient who had small bowel necrosis and septic peritonitis were observed during the operation and died post operative 6th days. Postoperative complications were not observed in the follow-up of other patients and reoperation was not required due to recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Abdominal cocoon is a condition that is usually diagnosed during operation in patients that were operated for reasons, such as the acute abdomen or intestinal obstruction. When the diagnose delayed, death can be seen due to small bowel necrosis and septic complications. High clinical suspicion and radiological imaging are important in the preoperative diagnosis. Treatment is required adhesiolysis and excision of the fibrous membranes.

BACKGROUND: Open or laparoscopic Graham’s omentopexy is frequently used in the treatment of peptic ulcer perforation (PUP). The technical difficulty of applying the omental plug, especially in patients with previous omentum resection, has led to the use of falciform ligament for the PUP, and some studies have reported that PUP may even be a more advantageous technique than omentopexy. Here, in this study, we aimed to compare the retrospective results of patients who underwent falciformopexy or omentopexy for PUP.
METHODS: Between 1999 and 2018, 303 patients who were followed-up and treated for PUP were included in this study. Patients who had malignancy, gastric resection, definitive ulcer surgery, laparoscopic surgery and nonoperative treatment were excluded from this study. In the remaining patients, either open ometopexy or falciformopexy were applied based on the surgeon’s choice. These two techniques were compared for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.
RESULTS: Falciformopexy (n=46) and omentopexy (n=243) groups had similar demographics, but ASA scores were lower in the falciformopexy group. For ulcer size and localization, duration of operation, no difference was found between the groups. There was no significant difference between the groups concerning general postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, atelectasis was more frequently observed in the omentopexy group, whereas the pexia failure was more frequent in the falciformopexy group (2.6% and 8.7%, p=0.04).
CONCLUSION: Falciformopexy is an alternative technique that can be used in situations where it is not possible to use the omentum. Falciformopexy is not superior to omentopexy for the repair of the PUP.

BACKGROUND: Perforation is a rare complication of peptic ulcer. Although the most widely accepted treatment for peptic ulcer perforation is surgery, non-operative treatment can be an option in selected patients. In this study, we aimed to present our non-surgical treatment experience in peptic ulcer perforation.
METHODS: In this study, the data of the patients who were treated due to peptic ulcer perforation between January 2012 and September 2017 in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnosis was reached by physical examination and radiologic findings. After obtaining the informed consent from the patients, non-operative treatment was performed to the selected patients who had normal vital parameters and did not have findings of generalized peritonitis in the abdominal examination. Oral food and fluid intake were stopped and intravenous fluid, antibiotics and pantoprazole were administered to all patients in this study.
RESULTS: A total of 41 patients were treated due to the diagnosis of peptic ulcer perforation in our clinic during the study period. Out of 41 patients, while 35 of the patients were operated, six of them were treated non-operatively. There were peritoneal irritation signs and symptoms in the upper quadrants on physical examination in all of the patients. None of them had generalized peritonitis. Abdominal X-ray and computed tomography were obtained from all of the patients. None of the patients in the non-operative group underwent any interventional procedure or surgery during the follow-up period. The median length of hospital stay was four days in this group. All of the patients were discharged uneventfully.
CONCLUSION: Standard treatment of peptic ulcer perforation in most of the patients is still surgical repair. Non-surgical treatment should be kept in mind as an option in the selected patients who had normal vital parameters and did not have any findings of generalized peritonitis in the abdominal examination. In this way, it may be possible to avoid unnecessary surgery and reduce the possible morbidity and mortality associated with the operation.

BACKGROUND: Late diagnosis continues to be a significant problem in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Most cases require emergency surgical intervention due to acute intestinal obstruction or perforation. This retrospective study was formed from an assessment of the clinical presentation, treatment, early results, and survival of patients with CRC undergoing emergency surgery for acute obstruction or perforation.
METHODS: Between 2012 and 2017, 612 patients underwent surgery for CRC. In all, 179 patients who required emergency treatment were retrospectively evaluated according to age, gender, significant comorbidities, physiological status, surgical indications, tumor location, tumor stage, perioperative blood transfusion rate, type of surgery, and the length of the operation and hospitalization.
RESULTS: In total, 152 (85%) patients had a complete obstruction and 27 (15%) patients had a perforation. A major postoperative complication was identified nearly in half of the patients. The overall mortality rate was 12% (22 patients). Mortality was seen in 12% (18 patients) cases received surgery due to obstruction and in 15% (four patients) cases received surgery due to perforation. Perioperative blood transfusion and a high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score were independent factors that predicted a major complication. Advanced age and perioperative blood transfusion were statistically independent prognostic factors for mortality.
CONCLUSION: Consisted with the findings of studies in the literature, the results of this study also revealed a high perioperative morbidity and mortality rate in patients with CRC who required urgent surgery. Our findings suggest that early detection and treatment of CRC with screening programs can be life-saving.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of the complex upper extremity defects is a challenging procedure for reconstructive surgeons because of the complex anatomical and functional structure of this region. In reconstruction, local and regional flap options involving the composite tissues are restricted. The posterior interosseous flap (PIO) has been presented “in a single study” with a wide variety of uses, and in this study, the versatility of PIO has been tried to be emphasized by its multitude uses as well as its chance at adaptability to each case. Hence, due to this, the objective to highlight the versatile utility of the PIO flap in clinical practice and to present a good option for the reconstruction of complex upper limb defects for various cases have been targeted.
METHODS: We used 26 PIO flaps in 25 patients (18 male and seven female patients) with upper limb defects. The main etiological causes were burn contracture, traffic accident, firearm and acute burn injury. Twenty-two flaps were harvested as fasciocutaneous and four flaps as osteo-fasciocutaneous manner, which were applied to the metacarpal defects. In this study, 25 flaps were transferred as pedicled flaps, of which 23 and 2 flaps had reverse and antegrade blood flows, respectively, whereas one flap was used as a free flap.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 14 months. All flaps except one, which had partial necrosis and secondary healed, survived completely. All patients were able to gain basic functions for daily routine activities in the late postoperative period. Patients and/or their parents were satisfied with the postoperative functional and aesthetic improvements.
CONCLUSION: Many advantages of the PIO flap make it useful for the reconstruction of upper limb complex defects. It can be versatilely used based on changing its flow direction and enrichment of contents.

BACKGROUND: Atypical femur fracture is a rare complication of bisphosphonate treatment, which is widely used for the prevention of osteoporotic fractures. This study aims to report clinical and radiological features and outcomes of surgically treated atypical femur fractures related to bisphosphonates.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients with the diagnosis of atypical femur fracture who were under bisphosphonate treatment and who were surgically treated in our clinic between January 2009 and December 2017. Patients who met the atypical femur fracture criteria defined by the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research were included in this study. Radiological features of the fractures, bisphosphonate treatment and duration, prodromal clinical and radiological findings were evaluated. Outcome measures included perioperative results, clinical and radiological outcomes and mobilization status.
RESULTS: In this study, 19 patients were enrolled. Mean age of the patients was 69.6 years (range: 60.8-85.1) and the mean follow-up was 33.8 months (range: 13-104). Mean bisphosphonate use duration was 8.65 years (range: 3-18). Four patients had bilateral fractures. Eight of 23 fractures were subtrochanteric and 15 were diaphyseal. Twenty-one fractures were treated with an intramedullary nail, one fracture with a locked compression plate and one fracture with cephalomedullary nail. Union was observed in 15 fractures within the first six months. There was a delayed union in four fractures and non-union in four fractures. Mean union time was 5.1 months (range: 2-9). While seven patients preserved their preoperative mobilization status, 12 patients showed regression after the fracture.
CONCLUSION: This study suggests that atypical femur fractures may have prodromal signs and that their management is complex due to high complication and nonunion rates.

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia affects 3–8% of the population. Femoral hernias are only a small number of groin hernias; however, femoral hernias are very important because these operations are generally emergency procedures, and bowel resections are frequently necessary. This study aims to compare surgical outcomes of patients with femoral hernias using different techniques under emergency or elective conditions.
METHODS: Between April 2013 and November 2017, 52 patients with femoral hernias were admitted to the emergency department of the General Surgery Clinics at two university hospitals in Istanbul. The medical files of all the patients who underwent surgery with a diagnosis of a femoral hernia were retrospectively evaluated. The demographic data, hernia side information, sac contents, surgical technique, length of hospital stay, recurrence according to the last outpatient clinic and complications were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: The sex distribution of the cases was as follows: 88.5% (n=46) of the patients were female, and 11.5% (n=6) were male. The mean age was 62.9±16.49 years (31–91 years). There were no significant differences between the two groups, according to the hernia side (p=0.282). Thirteen of the elective cases (52%) were operated using open techniques, and 12 cases (48%) were operated using laparoscopic techniques.
CONCLUSION: For the comparison of surgical techniques and outcomes, prospective randomized studies should be designed to standardize broad-based surgical techniques.

BACKGROUND: In this study, using single or double endoloops, with reference to the literature, we aimed to retrospectively assess the results for patients in our clinic who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy.
METHODS: This study included 251 patients who were operated on by a single surgeon; 137 of the patients were male (54.6%) and 114 were female (45.4%). Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of endoloop procedure that was used. Group 1 included 107 patients for whom a single endoloop was used. Group II included 144 patients for whom double endoloop was used. Age, sex, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, pathological findings, perioperative appendix findings, perioperative abdominal findings, post-operative complications requiring hospitalization and wound infections were assessed for each patient. Patients were also assessed statistically for complications.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics, perioperative surgery findings, pathological findings or duration of hospital stays between the two groups of the patients. However, the duration of operation was shorter in Group I (54.9±16.1 min) as compared to Group II (61.2±18.8 min). The incidence of complications requiring rehospitalization was statistically significantly lower in Group I (1.9%; n=2) as compared to Group II (9%; n=13) (p=0.018). There were no complications requiring re-operation for patients in Group I. In Group II, four patients (2.8%) required re-operation; however, this difference was not statistically significant. Concerning wound infection, there was also no significant difference between Group I (7.5% n=8) and Group II (4.9% n=7).
CONCLUSION: Using a double endoloop does not decrease the risk of post-operative complications, but it does increase the cost and the duration of the operation. We have concluded that using a single endoloop in a laparoscopic appendectomy may be more appropriate.

BACKGROUND: In our study, we have tried to find out how necessary whole-body computed tomography (WBCT) is to detect other body injuries that may accompany the patients, evaluating head trauma cases with WBCT.
METHODS: In our study, we included 198 patients, who were referred to our hospital’s emergency service after head trauma, had brain lesions detected in brain tomography (BT), had no additional examination findings and who underwent WBCT. In this retrospective study, patients’ age, gender, type of lesion in brain CT, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) values and WBCT findings were examined.
RESULTS: In this study, 85.4% of the patients were male and the average age was 25.7 years. The most common cranial CT findings were fracture, followed by parenchymal bleeding. 67% of the patients’ GCS were below 8. Additional trauma was detected in 78 of the patients (39.4%). The most common additional lesion was the thoracic contusion. The mean age of the patients with cervical injuries determined in CT was significantly high (p<0.05). Statistical significance was determined between cranial fracture, foreign body incidence and thoracic injuries (p<0.05). The incidence of cervical injuries was significantly higher in patients with brain contusion detected in CT (p<0.05). Fracture frequency and presence of additional lesions in WBCT were significantly high (p<0.05). There was no correlation between other cranial lesions and additional injury areas (p>0.05).
CONCLUSION: The number of studies evaluating WBCT is high in the literature. However, our study is important concerning that to our knowledge this study is the first study to evaluate the WBCT findings in the head trauma cases without the additional lesions on their bodies. WBCT scan should be recommended in patients whose clinical evaluation could not be completed. WBCT is an important diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of many pathologies, especially for intrathoracic lesions.

Non-traumatic rectum perforation is rarely seen if there is no underlying tumor formation. The perforations in the middle and lower parts of the rectum that are under the peritoneal reflex are asymptomatic unless there is intraabdominal infection or inflammation. In this study, we aim to present a patient who referred to the emergency surgery clinic with the small bowel prolapse from the anus.

Globe rupture is a major postoperative complication after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). Because the corneal wound is never comparable with that of healthy corneal tissue, globe rupture following blunt trauma occurs at the corneal graft-host junction. In this study, we report a case of scleral rupture that arose from blunt trauma occurring after PK. A 60-year-old female presented with loss of vision, redness and pain in the left eye, which was the consequence of blunt trauma, was our case in this study. Slit-lamp examination revealed ecchymosis on the eyelids, diffuse subconjunctival hemorrhage and total hyphema. The donor cornea was intact. The right eye showed PK, the cornea was transparent, and the sclera was blue. A 2 mm rupture behind the limbus extending from 3 o’clock to 9 o’clock in the upper half of the sclera was observed during exploratory surgery. She did not report any coexisting medical conditions except for systemic hypertension. The differential diagnosis of the bluish discoloration of her sclera was investigated. In detailed anamnesis, the patient reported that she had been treated for severe allergic eye disease during childhood. Vernal keratoconjunctivitis complication was diagnosed. It should be kept in mind that closed scleral perforation may occur in the patient with PK and blue sclera due to blunt trauma.